Holland v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Holland v. State

982 S.W.2d 789, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2238, 1998 WL 888534

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 22, 1998

DocketNo. ED 73809

StatusPublished

This text of 982 S.W.2d 789 (Holland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holland v. State, 982 S.W.2d 789, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2238, 1998 WL 888534 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl Holland (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. On a previous appeal in this case, this Court remanded for an evidentiary hearing. Holland v. State, 954 S.W.2d 660 (Mo.App.1997). Following the hearing, the court issued a judgment denying Movant’s motion, specifically finding Mov-ant’s testimony to not be credible.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl Holland (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. On a previous appeal in this case, this Court remanded for an evidentiary hearing. Holland v. State, 954 S.W.2d 660 (Mo.App.1997). Following the hearing, the court issued a judgment denying Movant’s motion, specifically finding Mov-ant’s testimony to not be credible.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

982 S.W.2d 789, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2238, 1998 WL 888534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-state-moctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack