Holland v. State
122 S.E. 95, 31 Ga. App. 783, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 188
This text of 122 S.E. 95 (Holland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holland v. State, 122 S.E. 95, 31 Ga. App. 783, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 188 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and impeaching and is not of such a character as would likely produce a different verdict upon another trial of the case.
2. There is no substantial merit in any special ground of the motion for a new trial.
3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
122 S.E. 95, 31 Ga. App. 783, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-state-gactapp-1924.