Holland v. State
122 S.E. 95, 31 Ga. App. 783, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 188
Opinion
1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and impeaching and is not of such a character as would likely produce a different verdict upon another trial of the case.
2. There is no substantial merit in any special ground of the motion for a new trial.
3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holland v. State, 122 S.E. 95, 31 Ga. App. 783, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 188 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
122 S.E. 95 (Holland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.