Holland v. State

90 So. 3d 960, 2012 WL 2359848, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10104
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 22, 2012
DocketNo. 5D11-4239
StatusPublished

This text of 90 So. 3d 960 (Holland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holland v. State, 90 So. 3d 960, 2012 WL 2359848, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10104 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We certify that the same issue reviewed in this case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). The mandate will be withheld pending final disposition of Adkins.

MONACO, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flagg v. State
74 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
71 So. 3d 117 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 So. 3d 960, 2012 WL 2359848, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.