Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Holland v. State

Holland v. State

825 So. 2d 520, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13197, 2002 WL 31026830
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 791 So. 2d 1256 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 2002·No. No. 1D01-3904·Published

Opinion

BARFIELD, J.

We find, as a matter of law, that the evidence presented by the state, even considering the legitimate inferences most favorable to the prosecution, is insufficient to support a finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant entered his neighbor’s house with the fully-formed conscious intent to commit a crime therein. Therefore the conviction for burglary of a structure is REVERSED.

KAHN, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holland v. State, 825 So. 2d 520, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13197, 2002 WL 31026830 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

825 So. 2d 520 (Holland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.