Holland v. State
This text of 558 So. 2d 500 (Holland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no merit either in the ground asserted for reversal of the finding of guilt and conviction, Pressley v. State, 395 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), review denied, 407 So.2d 1105 (Fla.1981), or the determination below that the crime involved, attempted second degree murder with a firearm, was a first degree felony. Montoya v. State, 489 So.2d 794 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), review denied, 496 So.2d 143 (Fla.1986). It is clear, however, that none of the grounds assigned for the upward departure sentence is legally sufficient. Accordingly, the cause is remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
558 So. 2d 500, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1770, 1990 WL 29489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.