Holland v. Schwartz
This text of 259 A.D. 1083 (Holland v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting the plaintiffs a preference and setting the case down for immediate trial, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. Under the facts disclosed by this record, it is our opinion that the learned Special Term improperly exercised its discretion. Order striking from the answer the second separate defense of the defendants Schwartz, and the first, second and third separate defenses from the amended answer of the defendants Baust and Abbington, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 1083, 22 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-schwartz-nyappdiv-1940.