Holland v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Holland v. Schwartz

259 A.D. 1083, 22 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8092

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 2, 1940·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order granting the plaintiffs a preference and setting the case down for immediate trial, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. Under the facts disclosed by this record, it is our opinion that the learned Special Term improperly exercised its discretion. Order striking from the answer the second separate defense of the defendants Schwartz, and the first, second and third separate defenses from the amended answer of the defendants Baust and Abbington, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting the plaintiffs a preference and setting the case down for immediate trial, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. Under the facts disclosed by this record, it is our opinion that the learned Special Term improperly exercised its discretion. Order striking from the answer the second separate defense of the defendants Schwartz, and the first, second and third separate defenses from the amended answer of the defendants Baust and Abbington, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Holland v. Schwartz, 259 A.D. 1083, 22 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 1083 (Holland v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related