Holland v. Saul

41 S.E. 995, 115 Ga. 511, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 466
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 6, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 S.E. 995 (Holland v. Saul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holland v. Saul, 41 S.E. 995, 115 Ga. 511, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 466 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Little, J.

Where an action against two persons was, on demurrer, dismissed as to one of them, it was incumbent on the plaintiff, if he desired to retain his joint action, to except within the time prescribed by law for filing a final bill of exceptions. He could not, in such a case, preserve his right to review a judgment sustaining the demurrer of one of the defendants by filing excep- ’ tions pendente lite, and_ assigning error thereon in a bill of exceptions tendered more than thirty days after the expiration of the term at which such demurrer had been sustained. Ellis v. Almand, ante, 333.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.
83 S.E. 131 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 S.E. 995, 115 Ga. 511, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-saul-ga-1902.