Holland v. Mount Auburn Gold Quartz Mining Co.
53 Cal. 149, 1878 Cal. LEXIS 99
Opinion
The defendant was in possession of the mining ground prior to the dates when the plaintiffs attempted to locate it, under the provisions of the Act of Congress of May 10, 1872.
Before the commencement of this action the location of plaintiffs was not distinctly marlced on the ground so that its boundaries could be readily traced, as required by the Act. (Rev. Stats. U. S. sec. 2324.)
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holland v. Mount Auburn Gold Quartz Mining Co., 53 Cal. 149, 1878 Cal. LEXIS 99 (Cal. 1878).
53 Cal. 149 (Holland v. Mount Auburn Gold Quartz Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sarnow v. Wood
20 P.2d 364 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Green v. Gavin
101 P. 931 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)
Worthen v. Sidway
79 S.W. 777 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1904)
Runnels v. State
77 S.W. 458 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1903)
Doe v. Waterloo Min. Co.
70 F. 455 (Ninth Circuit, 1895)
Donahue v. Meister
25 P. 1096 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Lebanon Mining Co. v. Consolidated Republican Mining Co.
6 Colo. 371 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1882)
Gonu v. Russell
3 Mont. 358 (Montana Supreme Court, 1879)