Holland v. Merrill

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Holland v. Merrill

89 A. 13, 111 Me. 583, 1913 Me. LEXIS 140

DecidedDecember 13, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 89 A. 13 (Holland v. Merrill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holland v. Merrill, 89 A. 13, 111 Me. 583, 1913 Me. LEXIS 140 (Me. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an action of assumpsit on an account annexed for board, care and nursing the defendant’s intestate for 805 days, for which she charges three dollars per day. She gives credit on said account for $120 on account. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for [584]*584$1250, and the defendant moved to have the verdict set aside. Motion overruled.

E. M. Simpson and Matthew Laughlin, for plaintiff. John B. Merrill and Alanson J. Merrill, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an action of assumpsit on an account annexed for board, care and nursing the defendant’s intestate for 805 days, for which she charges three dollars per day. She gives credit on said account for $120 on account. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for [584]*584$1250, and the defendant moved to have the verdict set aside. Motion overruled.

E. M. Simpson and Matthew Laughlin, for plaintiff. John B. Merrill and Alanson J. Merrill, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A. 13, 111 Me. 583, 1913 Me. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-merrill-me-1913.