Holland v. McDonald
This text of 300 F. App'x 648 (Holland v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an interlocutory appeal in which Officers Scott McDonald, Robert Mayer, Timothy Pugh, and Ed Leach (“Officers”), appeal the denial of their motion for summary judgment on the ground that Jon Tristan Holland’s excessive force claim [649]*649against them is precluded by the defense of qualified immunity.
We have reviewed the record and considered the oral argument of counsel. Based thereupon, and accepting Holland’s version of the facts, as we must at this stage, we agree with the district court’s comprehensive order that disputed issues of material fact exist regarding the use of excessive force.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
300 F. App'x 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-mcdonald-ca11-2008.