Holland v. John
46 A. 172, 60 N.J. Eq. 435, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 185
This text of 46 A. 172 (Holland v. John) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holland v. John, 46 A. 172, 60 N.J. Eq. 435, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 185 (N.J. 1900).
Opinion
The decrees appealed from must be affirmed, for the reasons given by Yice-Chaneellor Eeed for advising them.
For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Depue, Yan Syckel, Gummere, Ludlow, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Yredenburgh — 9.
For reversal — Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Collins, Hixon — 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Clark v. Roeder
131 A. 620 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 A. 172, 60 N.J. Eq. 435, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-john-nj-1900.