Holland v. John
46 A. 172, 60 N.J. Eq. 435, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 185
Opinion
The decrees appealed from must be affirmed, for the reasons given by Yice-Chaneellor Eeed for advising them.
For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Depue, Yan Syckel, Gummere, Ludlow, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Yredenburgh — 9.
For reversal — Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Collins, Hixon — 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holland v. John, 46 A. 172, 60 N.J. Eq. 435, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 185 (N.J. 1900).
46 A. 172 (Holland v. John) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. Roeder
131 A. 620 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)