Holland v. Istre

203 So. 2d 754, 1967 La. App. LEXIS 4982
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 27, 1967
DocketNo. 2119
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 So. 2d 754 (Holland v. Istre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holland v. Istre, 203 So. 2d 754, 1967 La. App. LEXIS 4982 (La. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinions

SAVOY, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in the case of Odom, Jr. et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al. La.App., 203 So.2d 752, handed down this date, the judgment of the district court in the instant case is affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Odom v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
203 So. 2d 752 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 So. 2d 754, 1967 La. App. LEXIS 4982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-istre-lactapp-1967.