Holland v. . Isler

77 N.C. 1
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 77 N.C. 1 (Holland v. . Isler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holland v. . Isler, 77 N.C. 1 (N.C. 1877).

Opinion

Reads, J.

The Constitution provides that “the General ‘Assembly may tax trades, professions, &c.” Art. Y. § 3. The General Assembly has authorized the Town of Golds-boro “to lay and collect a monthly tax on lawyers, physicians-&e.,” Private Laws, 1866.

The defendants are lawyers and physicians in the Town of Goldsboro, and the Town has laid a tax upon'them which they refuse to pay. This would seem 'to make a clear case against the defendants.

There is no error.

Per CuriaM. . Judgment affirmed»-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Dixon
183 P. 642 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1919)
Pocomoke Guano Co. v. City of New Bern
74 S.E. 2 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)
State v. Doran
134 N.W. 53 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1912)
State v. . Danenberg
66 S.E. 301 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
Lent v. Portland
71 P. 645 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1903)
Ex Parte Williams
21 L.R.A. 783 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1892)
Board of Commissioners v. Taylor
6 S.E. 114 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1888)
City of Wilmington v. MacKs
86 N.C. 88 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 N.C. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-isler-nc-1877.