Holland v. Holland

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Holland v. Holland

DecidedMay 27, 2008

Docket2008-UP-277

StatusUnpublished

This text of Holland v. Holland (Holland v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holland v. Holland, (S.C. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Renee McDuffie Holland, Respondent,

v.

Wells McManus Holland, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County
Henry T. Woods, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-277
Submitted May 1, 2008 Filed May 27, 2008

AFFIRMED

Wells McManus Holland, of Wagener, pro se.

Charles D. Lee, III, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Wells Holland appeals the family courts grant of a divorce to Renee Holland on the grounds of one year separation, sole custody of their children, and periodic alimony and child support of $750.00 and $675.00 a month, respectively. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and the following authorities: 11 U.S.C.A. §1301 (2004) (stating a creditor may not act or commence any civil action to collect debt of the debtor, unless the case is dismissed); Nelson vs. QHG of S.C., Inc., 362 S.C. 421, 608 S.E.2d 855 (2005) (finding the remedy for inadequate representation is a malpractice action against the former attorney); and Floyd v. Floyd, 365 S.C. 56, 615 S.E.2d 465 (Ct. App. 2005) (holding an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court in order to be preserved for appellate review).

Accordingly, the family courts order is

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN, C.J., and SHORT, J., and KONDUROS, J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Renee McDuffie Holland, Respondent,

v.

Wells McManus Holland, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County
Henry T. Woods, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-277
Submitted May 1, 2008 Filed May 27, 2008

AFFIRMED

Wells McManus Holland, of Wagener, pro se.

Charles D. Lee, III, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Wells Holland appeals the family courts grant of a divorce to Renee Holland on the grounds of one year separation, sole custody of their children, and periodic alimony and child support of $750.00 and $675.00 a month, respectively. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and the following authorities: 11 U.S.C.A. §1301 (2004) (stating a creditor may not act or commence any civil action to collect debt of the debtor, unless the case is dismissed); Nelson vs. QHG of S.C., Inc., 362 S.C. 421, 608 S.E.2d 855 (2005) (finding the remedy for inadequate representation is a malpractice action against the former attorney); and Floyd v. Floyd, 365 S.C. 56, 615 S.E.2d 465 (Ct. App. 2005) (holding an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court in order to be preserved for appellate review).

Accordingly, the family courts order is

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN, C.J., and SHORT, J., and KONDUROS, J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Holland v. Holland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-holland-scctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack