Holland v. Holland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Holland v. Holland

193 A.D.2d 416, 598 N.Y.S.2d 708

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D.2d 416 (Holland v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holland v. Holland, 193 A.D.2d 416, 598 N.Y.S.2d 708 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.), entered April 22, 1992, which denied defendant’s motion to modify an income execution, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s application for a modification of the income [417]*417execution dated May 15, 1991 on the ground of mistake of fact was untimely (CPLR 5241 [e]). In any event, we would not address those issues raised by defendant for the first time on appeal. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.), entered April 22, 1992, which denied defendant’s motion to modify an income execution, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s application for a modification of the income [417]*417execution dated May 15, 1991 on the ground of mistake of fact was untimely (CPLR 5241 [e]). In any event, we would not address those issues raised by defendant for the first time on appeal. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 416, 598 N.Y.S.2d 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-holland-nyappdiv-1993.