Holland v. Holland

218 A.D. 778

This text of 218 A.D. 778 (Holland v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holland v. Holland, 218 A.D. 778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Order denying motion to vacate examination of defendants before trial as to the matters contained in 1, 3 and 4 of the notice of examination before trial, modified so as to provide that the examination as to moneys derived from rents, issues and profits of the premises described in the complaint, specified in item 3 of the notice, be limited to rents, issues and profits received during plaintiff’s ownership of the premises, and which she alleges were applied to the payment of the mortgage upon the property; and as so modified the order appealed from is affirmed, without costs. We think plaintiff’s right to a general accounting of rents and profits received must first be established under the allegation in her complaint, before she is entitled to examine defendants beyond the period above limited. (Moore v. Reinhardt, 132 App. Div. 707; Del Genovese v. Del Genovese, 149 id. 266.) Order denying motion to resettle affirmed, without costs. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Reinhardt
132 A.D. 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 A.D. 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-holland-nyappdiv-1926.