Holland v. Holland
9 Del. 86
Opinion
however, on learning that the summons for the appearance of the defendant was not returnable until the next term, considered the application premature at this stage of the proceeding, and refused to grant the rule.
Layton, for the plaintiff.
J. H. Paynter and Wright for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holland v. Holland, 9 Del. 86 (Del. Ct. App. 1869).
9 Del. 86 (Holland v. Holland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.