Holland v. Goldco, Inc.

549 So. 2d 719, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2212, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5157, 1989 WL 109525
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2623
StatusPublished

This text of 549 So. 2d 719 (Holland v. Goldco, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holland v. Goldco, Inc., 549 So. 2d 719, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2212, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5157, 1989 WL 109525 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, the plaintiffs in a personal injury suit arising out of a slip and fall accident, appeal an adverse final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee. We reverse the final summary judgment on the grounds that genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether appellee provided adequate warning to the plaintiff, Luie Holland, to apprise him of the wet condition of the restaurant floor. Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 351 So.2d 29 (Fla. 1977).

REVERSED.

SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
351 So. 2d 29 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
549 So. 2d 719, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2212, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5157, 1989 WL 109525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-goldco-inc-fladistctapp-1989.