Holland v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Holland v. Commonwealth

680 N.E.2d 1162, 425 Mass. 1003, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 143

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJune 30, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 680 N.E.2d 1162 (Holland v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holland v. Commonwealth, 680 N.E.2d 1162, 425 Mass. 1003, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 143 (Mass. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant has not met the rule’s requirement that he “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” “The denial of a motion to dismiss pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 13[, 378 Mass. 871 (1979),] is not appealable by a defendant until after trial.” Ventresco v. Commonwealth, 409 Mass. 82, 83 (1991).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant has not met the rule’s requirement that he “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” “The denial of a motion to dismiss pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 13[, 378 Mass. 871 (1979),] is not appealable by a defendant until after trial.” Ventresco v. Commonwealth, 409 Mass. 82, 83 (1991).

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

680 N.E.2d 1162, 425 Mass. 1003, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-commonwealth-mass-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack