Holland v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Holland v. Commonwealth

680 N.E.2d 1162, 425 Mass. 1003, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 143

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided June 30, 1997·Published

Opinion

The defendant has not met the rule’s requirement that he “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” “The denial of a motion to dismiss pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 13[, 378 Mass. 871 (1979),] is not appealable by a defendant until after trial.” Ventresco v. Commonwealth, 409 Mass. 82, 83 (1991).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant has not met the rule’s requirement that he “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” “The denial of a motion to dismiss pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 13[, 378 Mass. 871 (1979),] is not appealable by a defendant until after trial.” Ventresco v. Commonwealth, 409 Mass. 82, 83 (1991).

Judgment affirmed.

Holland v. Commonwealth, 680 N.E.2d 1162, 425 Mass. 1003, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 143 (Mass. 1997).

Pincite

680 N.E.2d 1162 (Holland v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related