Holland v. City of New York

422 F. App'x 18
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 16, 2011
DocketNo. 10-1842-cv
StatusPublished

This text of 422 F. App'x 18 (Holland v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holland v. City of New York, 422 F. App'x 18 (2d Cir. 2011).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Sheriff Andre Jackson appeals the district court’s March 30, 2010 order granting the municipal parties’ motion for summary judgment on his cross-claim for reimbursement and indemnification of attorney’s fees incurred litigating a civil action in which both the City and Jackson were defendants. He also appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment on the same claim.

After reviewing the issues on appeal and the record of proceedings below, we affirm for substantially the same reasons articulated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned order and opinion.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
422 F. App'x 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-city-of-new-york-ca2-2011.