Holland v. Brown
17 N.Y.S. 657, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 936, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 437
This text of 17 N.Y.S. 657 (Holland v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holland v. Brown, 17 N.Y.S. 657, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 936, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 437 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
Opinion
This is an equitable action for the reformation of a deed of conveyance of real property. The cause was tried before a judge at special term, and he has found all the facts constituting the fraud in favor of the plaintiff, and the testimony fully sustains his finding. All the questions of law were properly disposed of, and we find no error. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 N.Y.S. 657, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 936, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-brown-nysupct-1892.