Holland v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co.
147 N.E. 214, 239 N.Y. 605, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 994
Opinion
Affirmed upon the authority of Brassel v. Electric Welding Company (239 N. Y. 78). The affidavit sets forth facts sufficient to show an accord and satisfaction or a release by a payment in full within the purport and meaning of subdivision 7 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur; McLaughlin, J., absent.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holland v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co., 147 N.E. 214, 239 N.Y. 605, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 994 (N.Y. 1925).
147 N.E. 214 (Holland v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Terrace Hotel Co. v. State
26 A.D.2d 23 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
People v. Coppock
206 Misc. 89 (New York Court of Special Session, 1954)
Freader v. Cities Service Transp. Co.
14 F. Supp. 456 (S.D. New York, 1935)
Swan v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
129 Misc. 500 (New York Supreme Court, 1927)
Lierness v. Long Island Railroad
217 A.D. 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
Christensen v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.
216 A.D. 274 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)