Holland Pecan Co. v. Brown
170 S.E. 357, 177 Ga. 525, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 346
This text of 170 S.E. 357 (Holland Pecan Co. v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holland Pecan Co. v. Brown, 170 S.E. 357, 177 Ga. 525, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 346 (Ga. 1933).
Opinion
1. In applications for interlocutory injunction, the exercise of the discretion of the chancellor will not be disturbed unless there was a manifest abuse of discretion; and this does not appear in the record in the present case.
2. The court did not err in refusing to enjoin the exercise of the power of sale contained in the security deed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Georgia Loan & Trust Co. v. Dyer
213 S.E.2d 864 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Champion v. Neason
136 S.E.2d 718 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Dozier v. Mangham
113 S.E.2d 212 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Associated Mutuals Inc. v. Coe
26 S.E.2d 450 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Atkinson v. England
22 S.E.2d 798 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Moon v. Clark
14 S.E.2d 481 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Thompson v. Mutual Investment Corp.
4 S.E.2d 44 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Jones v. Lanier Development Co.
2 S.E.2d 923 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
170 S.E. 357, 177 Ga. 525, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-pecan-co-v-brown-ga-1933.