Holland-Hewitt v. Allstate Life Insurance Company

Opinion

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 SUSAN L. HOLLAND-HEWITT, Case No. 1:20-cv-00652-DAD-SAB

11 Plaintiff, ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 v. (ECF No. 44) COMPANY, 14 Defendant. 15 16 On March 22, 2022, the parties filed a stipulated protective order, and have requested the 17 Court approve and enter the parties stipulated protective order. (ECF No. 44.) The Court has 18 reviewed the stipulated agreement and finds good cause to approve and enter the protective order 19 into the record of this action. 20 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. The stipulated protective order filed on March 22, 2022 (ECF No. 44), is entered; 22 2. The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States 23 District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents which are to be filed 24 under seal will require a written request which complies with Local Rule 141; 25 3. The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to show 26 either good cause or compelling reasons to seal the documents, depending on the 27 type of filing, Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009); Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1101 (9th Cir. 1 2016); and 2 4. If a party’s request to file Protected Material under seal is denied by the Court, then 3 the previously filed material shall be immediately accepted by the court and 4 become information in the public record and the information will be deemed filed 5 as of the date that the request to file the Protected Information under seal was 6 made. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAA (e_ 9 | Dated: _March 22, 2022 _ ef 0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28