Holland, Damon v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 21, 2013·No. 05-12-01292-CV·Published

Opinion

DISMISS; Opinion issued March 21, 2013

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01292-CV

DAMON HOLLAND, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 86474-422

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis Opinion by Chief Justice Wright By postcard dated November 21, 2012, we notified appellant the time for filing his brief

in this case had expired. We directed appellant to file his brief and an extension motion within

ten days. We cautioned appellant that if he failed to file his brief and an extension motion, the

appeal would be dismissed. To date, appellant has not filed his brief, an extension motion, or

otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c).

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

121292F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

DAMON HOLLAND, Appellant On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court, Kaufman County, Texas No. 05-12-01292-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. 86474-422. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee THE STATE OF TEXAS recover its costs of this appeal from appellant DAMON HOLLAND.

Judgment entered March 21, 2013.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holland, Damon v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Holland, Damon v. State (Holland, Damon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.