Holladay v. Johnson

12 Iowa 563
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided January 3, 1862·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Wright, J.

I. The decree below must be reversed for the reason that affirmative relief is granted respondents, without being asked either by cross-bill or otherwise. Compton v. Corner, 4 Iowa, 577; Armstrong v. Pierson, 5 Ib., 317; McGregor v. McGregor, 9 Ib., 65.

II. An order was made in November, 1859, referring the cause to a master to ascertain and report the amount of respondents’ liens upon the land named in the bill. The report was made in April, 1860, and a decree entered confirming the report, ordering that the amount found due, should be a lien, and that the premises be sold to satisfy the same. This appeal was taken within one year from the date of the final decree. Held, that the appeal was in time, and that complainant was not concluded by the fact that the first order (of reference) was made more than one year before the appeal.

Counsel refer to an amended transcript, which it is claimed shows that these proceedings were conducted by consent and agreement. No such transcript is before us, however, and we can not act upon it.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holladay v. Johnson, 12 Iowa 563 (iowa 1862).

12 Iowa 563 (Holladay v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salem v. Salem
60 N.W.2d 772 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1953)
Miller v. Kramer
126 N.W. 931 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1910)