Holladay v. Alabama
This text of 510 U.S. 1171 (Holladay v. Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
510 U.S. 1171
Holladay
v.
Alabama.
No. 93-7491.
Supreme Court of United States.
February 28, 1994.
Appeal from the Ct. Crim. App. Ala.
Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 93-6817, 620 So. 2d 152; No. 93-6846, 263 Ga. 214, 430 S. E. 2d 576; No. 93-6974, 610 So. 2d 1288; No. 93-7026, 4 F. 3d 1446; No. 93-7051, 624 So. 2d 1138; No. 93-7158, 627 So. 2d 874; No. 93-7323, 125 Idaho 530, 873 P. 2d 784; No. 93-7336, 868 S. W. 2d 705; No. 93-7373, 5 F. 3d 93; No. 93-7475, 5 F. 3d 758; 93-7491, 629 So. 2d 673.
JUSTICE BLACKMUN, dissenting.
Adhering to my view that the death penalty cannot be imposed fairly within the constraints of our Constitution, see my dissent in Callins v. Collins, ante, p. 1143, I would grant the petitions for writs of certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
510 U.S. 1171, 114 S. Ct. 1208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holladay-v-alabama-scotus-1994.