Holiday v. State

776 So. 2d 1026, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 437, 2001 WL 45245
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holiday v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4670
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 2001·No. No. 1D00-1868·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Zachary Holiday appeals the denial of his motion to modify or reduce his sentence. The trial court denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction. We treat the appeal as a petition for a writ of certiorari, grant the petition and reverse. See Davis v. State, 745 So.2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

The Supreme Court’s mandate affirming the petitioner’s conviction issued on February 24, 2000. The petitioner filed this motion on April 24, 2000, which was within the 60-day time period required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.800(c). Accordingly, the trial court had jurisdiction to consider the motion on its merits and its failure to do so constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law. See id. at 499.

REVERSED and REMANDED for consideration on the merits.

BENTON, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holiday v. State, 776 So. 2d 1026, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 437, 2001 WL 45245 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

776 So. 2d 1026 (Holiday v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
745 So. 2d 499 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)