Holiday v. Maryland

177 F.2d 844
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 1949
DocketNo. 5922
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 177 F.2d 844 (Holiday v. Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holiday v. Maryland, 177 F.2d 844 (4th Cir. 1949).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in a habeas corpus case by a prisoner who is imprisoned in the Maryland Penitentiary under the sentence and judgment of a Maryland state court. The application for the writ was properly denied since application for habeas corpus on practically the same grounds was denied by the Maryland courts. Holliday v. Warden, 59 A.2d 777 and Holliday v. Warden, 62 A.2d 573, certiorari being denied in the latter case by the Supreme Court, Holiday v. Warden, 336 U.S. 928, 69 S.Ct. 650, 93 L.Ed. -. Certiorari was also denied by the Supreme Court to the Criminal Court of Baltimore, Holiday v. Swenson, 334 U.S. 822, 68 S.Ct. 1075, 92 L.Ed. 1751. There are no allegations which would justify the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus by the lower federal courts under such circumstances. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254; Wade v. Mayo, 334 U.S. 672, 68 S.Ct. 1270, 92 L.Ed. 1647; Goodman v. Swenson, 4 Cir., 173 F.2d 349.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hodge v. Heinze
165 F. Supp. 726 (N.D. California, 1958)
Collins v. Heinze
125 F. Supp. 186 (N.D. California, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 F.2d 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holiday-v-maryland-ca4-1949.