Holiday Universal, Inc. v. Patterson

116 Misc. 2d 547, 456 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1982 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3914
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 12, 1982·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

John S. Lockman, J.

Motion to vacate a satisfaction of judgment, though unopposed, is denied, without prejudice.

Plaintiff secured a judgment for $626.58 against defendant upon a retail installment credit agreement. Defendant paid $400 on July 6, 1982. On August 5, 1982, plaintiff’s attorney received a third-party check in payment of the balance. On August 18, 1982, he filed a satisfaction of judgment. Thereafter, the third-party check was returned for insufficient funds.

Having accepted the third-party check, plaintiff cites no authority which would entitle him to vacating the satisfaction. Clearly, he has a cause of action against the maker of the check. (Uniform Commercial Code, § 3-122.) Absent authority to support the granting of the relief sought, the court is constrained to deny the motion but without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holiday Universal, Inc. v. Patterson, 116 Misc. 2d 547, 456 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1982 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3914 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1982).

116 Misc. 2d 547 (Holiday Universal, Inc. v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.