Holiday Truck & Car Sales, Inc. v. Coldewey

434 So. 2d 344
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 15, 1983
Docket83-18
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 434 So. 2d 344 (Holiday Truck & Car Sales, Inc. v. Coldewey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holiday Truck & Car Sales, Inc. v. Coldewey, 434 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

434 So.2d 344 (1983)

HOLIDAY TRUCK AND CAR SALES, INC., a Florida Corporation, A.J. Eardley and Richard Scepkowski, Appellants,
v.
Rolf COLDEWEY, Appellee.

No. 83-18.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 15, 1983.

John A. Shahan of the Law Offices of Donald E. Scholl, Tarpon Springs, for appellants.

Douglas R. Bald of Fergeson, Skipper & Shaw, P.A., Sarasota, for appellee.

*345 GRIMES, Judge.

Appellants complain that the court erred in failing to grant their motion to change venue from Sarasota County to Pasco County.

Appellee, a Sarasota County resident, brought suit against Holiday Truck and Car Sales, Inc., a Florida corporation, A.J. Eardley and Richard Scepkowski over the purchase of a tractor from Holiday. He alleged that the appellants made fraudulent misrepresentations concerning title and that even though he later returned the tractor, he was not repaid the purchase price. He sought damages for breach of contract and fraud.

In an affidavit attached to appellants' motion, Eardley, a Holiday employee, recited that he and Scepkowski were residents of Pasco County and that Holiday had its only corporate office in Pasco County. He also stated that all negotiations involving the matters alleged in the complaint took place in Pasco County. The appellee filed no countervailing affidavit, and the complaint was unsworn.

The only plausible theory for maintaining this suit in Sarasota County is that the cause of action accrued there. §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat. (1981). Yet, appellee made no effort to contradict the sworn statement that all the acts upon which the cause of action was premised occurred in Pasco County. Consequently, the court should have directed a change of venue to Pasco County. Straske v. McGillicuddy, 388 So.2d 1334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Perry Building Systems, Inc. v. Hayes & Bates, Inc., 361 So.2d 443 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

REVERSED.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Regions Financial Corp. v. Mercenari
78 So. 3d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Tulli v. Tulli
780 So. 2d 213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Miller v. SOUTHLAND INSURANCE COMPANY
513 So. 2d 800 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Tropicana Products, Inc. v. Shirley
501 So. 2d 1373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Searle v. Fortune Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
480 So. 2d 187 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 So. 2d 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holiday-truck-car-sales-inc-v-coldewey-fladistctapp-1983.