Holiday Plaza Investment Corp. v. Clark

306 So. 2d 161
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 17, 1975
DocketNo. 73-1313
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 306 So. 2d 161 (Holiday Plaza Investment Corp. v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holiday Plaza Investment Corp. v. Clark, 306 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

COWART, JOE A., Jr., Associate Judge.

The trial judge dismissed a complaint for eviction of a tenant from a mobile home lot because the complaint did not allege one of the grounds then contained in Section 83.271(1), F.S. The trial judge held the statute was exclusively applicable and de-dined to hold that an oral tenancy at will or from month to month of a mobile home lot was also subject to termination under Sections 83.01, 83.02, and 83.03, F.S.

Since this appeal was filed our Supreme Court has decided Stewart v. Green, 300 So.2d 889 (Fla.1974) and Palm Beach Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Strong, 300 So.2d 881 (Fla.1974). Those cases uphold the constitutionality of, and construe, the statute here in question and, at least by implication, indicate that the statute applies to all oral leases of mobile homes and mobile home lots. We find no basis for holding that the trial judge abused judicial discretion in determining $900.00 to be a reasonable attorney’s fee for counsel for the tenant.

The appealed judgments are

Affirmed.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donovan v. Environs Palm Beach
309 So. 2d 561 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 So. 2d 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holiday-plaza-investment-corp-v-clark-fladistctapp-1975.