Holgate State Bank v. Gauggel

217 N.E.2d 867, 6 Ohio St. 2d 256, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 420, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 377
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1966·No. No. 39841·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question presented is whether the mortgage filed for record prior to the date of the commencement of any construction work on the premises has priority oyer the materialmen’s liens for material furnished subsequent to the filing of the mortgage.

Section 5301.23, Revised Code, provides that “all mortgages properly executed shall he recorded in the office of the county recorder of the county in which the mortgaged premises are situated, and take effect from the time they are delivered to such recorder for record.”

The plaintiff’s mortgage, having been recorded before any work was done or material furnished, takes priority over the materialmen’s liens. Rider v. Crobaugh, 100 Ohio St. 88.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taet, C. J. Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schheideb and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holgate State Bank v. Gauggel, 217 N.E.2d 867, 6 Ohio St. 2d 256, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 420, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 377 (Ohio 1966).

217 N.E.2d 867 (Holgate State Bank v. Gauggel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Summer & Co. v. DCR Corp.
351 N.E.2d 485 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1976)
Wayne Building & Loan Co. v. Yarborough
228 N.E.2d 841 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1967)