Holdorf v. Charles F. Fry Advertising Associates, Inc.

176 So. 2d 381, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4275
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 18, 1965·No. No. 4792·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By its verdict in a malicious prosecution case, the jury found that the defendant, Charles F. Fry Advertising Associates, Inc.,, was liable to the plaintiff, Benjamin G. Holdorf, for compensatory damages in the-sum of $5,500 and punitive damages of [382]*382$1,000. Final judgment was entered consequent upon the jury’s verdict; but, subsequently, the trial court set aside the judgment and granted the motion of the defendant for a new trial, limiting the issue to that of damages only; and this appeal by Holdorf ensued. It has not been made to appear that the trial court erred in rendition of the order so as to require the overturning of it.

Affirmed.

SMITH, C. J., and SHANNON and KANNER, (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holdorf v. Charles F. Fry Advertising Associates, Inc., 176 So. 2d 381, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

176 So. 2d 381 (Holdorf v. Charles F. Fry Advertising Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roemelmeyer v. Richard A. Marshall Insurance Agency
223 So. 2d 753 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)