Holding v. Holding
5 N.C. 9
Opinion
No circumstances of surprize, accidentar fratid, appear to have intervened in this case, to prevent the party from having a full hearing in the County Court, upon the points, which form the ground of the application to the Court ef Equity ; Of these points, tho County Court, up-[11]*11«11 petition, have equal and concurrent jurisdiction with the Court of Equity. The bill is, therefore, dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holding v. Holding, 5 N.C. 9 (N.C. 1804).
5 N.C. 9 (Holding v. Holding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.