Holderfield v. . Pou

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Holderfield v. . Pou

183 S.E. 373, 209 N.C. 844, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 377

DecidedJanuary 22, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 183 S.E. 373 (Holderfield v. . Pou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holderfield v. . Pou, 183 S.E. 373, 209 N.C. 844, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 377 (N.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.'

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, one of its members, Justice Devin, not sitting, the judgment of' the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision in this action without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.

Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.'

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, one of its members, Justice Devin, not sitting, the judgment of' the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision in this action without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.

Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 S.E. 373, 209 N.C. 844, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holderfield-v-pou-nc-1936.