Holderfield v. . Pou

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Holderfield v. . Pou

183 S.E. 373, 209 N.C. 844, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 377

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 22, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.'

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, one of its members, Justice Devin, not sitting, the judgment of' the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision in this action without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.

Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.'

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, one of its members, Justice Devin, not sitting, the judgment of' the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision in this action without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.

Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Holderfield v. . Pou, 183 S.E. 373, 209 N.C. 844, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 377 (N.C. 1936).

Pincite

183 S.E. 373 (Holderfield v. . Pou) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.