Holder v. Sutherland

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Holder v. Sutherland

191 So. 2d 439

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 3, 1966·No. No. H-409·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court and the briefs and record on appeal having been studied, this court does not find it can substitute its judgment for that of the jury and finding no reversible error, the judgment appealed is affirmed under authority of Calhoun v. State, 136 So.2d 352 (Fla.App. 1st, 1962).

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SACK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court and the briefs and record on appeal having been studied, this court does not find it can substitute its judgment for that of the jury and finding no reversible error, the judgment appealed is affirmed under authority of Calhoun v. State, 136 So.2d 352 (Fla.App. 1st, 1962).

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SACK, JJ., concur.

Holder v. Sutherland, 191 So. 2d 439 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

191 So. 2d 439 (Holder v. Sutherland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related