Holder v. State
This text of 732 So. 2d 415 (Holder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. See Roman v. State, 475 So.2d 1228, 1232 (Fla.1985)(‘We review the trial court’s - ruling [concerning the voluntariness of the confession] by viewing the totality of the circumstances.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1090, 106 S.Ct. 1480, 89 L.Ed.2d 734 (1986). Cf. Drake v. State, 441 So.2d 1079, 1081 (Fla.1983)(The record does not show that it was made clear to defendant that he was free to leave at time of interrogation, and defendant specifically requested the discontinuance of further interrogation without his attorney.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 978, 104 S.Ct. 2361, 80 L.Ed.2d 832 (1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
732 So. 2d 415, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4642, 1999 WL 213002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holder-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.