Holder v. Holder

59 N.Y.S. 204, 40 A.D. 255

This text of 59 N.Y.S. 204 (Holder v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holder v. Holder, 59 N.Y.S. 204, 40 A.D. 255 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is an inaccuracy in the opinion of the court below, in the statement that the case of Weston v. Stoddard, 137 N. Y. 119, 33 N. E. 62, was not considered in the opinion delivered in Ellerson v. Westcott, 148 N. Y. 149, 42 N. E. 540. We think the judgment of the special term is correct, and we concur in the reasons assigned therefor by Mr. Justice DYKMAN, with the exception indicated. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellerson v. . Westcott
42 N.E. 540 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Weston v. . Stoddard
33 N.E. 62 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 N.Y.S. 204, 40 A.D. 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holder-v-holder-nyappdiv-1899.