Holder, Harley v. Nathan Marcum d/b/a Marcum Lumber

2021 TN WC 233
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedOctober 6, 2021
Docket2020-03-1281
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 TN WC 233 (Holder, Harley v. Nathan Marcum d/b/a Marcum Lumber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holder, Harley v. Nathan Marcum d/b/a Marcum Lumber, 2021 TN WC 233 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2021).

Opinion

FILED Oct 06, 2021 07:05 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT KNOXVILLE

HARLEY HOLDER, ) Docket Number: 2020-03-1281 Employee, ) v. ) State File Number: 70189-2020 NATHAN MARCUM d/b/a ) MARCUM LUMBER, ) Judge Brian K. Addington Employer. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DECISION ON THE RECORD

Harley Holder suffered serious injuries when he fell down the stairs while working at Marcum Lumber. Nathan Marcum, the owner of Marcum Lumber, provided no medical benefits but did pay a small amount of temporary disability benefits. Because he did receive medical care and only a portion of his temporary disability benefits, Mr. Holder filed a request for expedited hearing seeking additional benefits. After considering the evidence presented at an expedited hearing on September 30, 2021, the Court finds that Mr. Holder is likely to succeed at a hearing on the merits in proving his entitlement to both medical and temporary disability benefits.

Facts

Nathan Marcum hired Mr. Holder and paid him an average weekly wage of $464.00. Mr. Marcum’s lumber business employed more than five employees but did not have workers’ compensation insurance. It was at his business that Mr. Holder fell down steps on October 1, 2019.

In his fall, Mr. Holder injured his right foot, right ankle, left arm and shoulder, rotator cuff, and labrum. He sought medical treatment at his own expense because Mr. Marcum did not provide a panel of physicians or offer to pay for medical care. Mr. Holder underwent surgery by Dr. Michael Heilig for his ankle on September 28, 2020. He introduced medical bills showing that the total cost of his treatment was $54,665.56; but he also requested additional treatment. Mr. Holder’s physicians placed restrictions or took

1 him off work from October 1, 2019, until the present and have not placed him at maximum medical improvement.

Although he paid no medical benefits, Mr. Holder said Mr. Marcum gave him $1,550.00 between November and January 2020 because he could not accommodate Mr. Holder’s restrictions. Despite making these payments, Mr. Marcum admitted that he later terminated Mr. Holder without cause.1

After the loss of his job, Mr. Holder found limited employment starting October 27, 2020. He earns $1,000.00 per month at his new job.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At this expedited hearing, Mr. Holder must show he would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits regarding his requests for medical and temporary disability benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2020).

Turning first to medical benefits, based on Mr. Holder’s affidavit, he fell and sustained injuries in the course and scope of his employment. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50- 6-102(14)(A)-(B). Mr. Marcum, however, provided neither a panel of physicians nor paid any of Mr. Holder’s $54,655.56 in medical bills related to the fall.

An employer is obligated to provide these medical benefits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204. So, the Court holds that Mr. Marcum shall pay these medical bills and provide ongoing medical treatment with Dr. Heilig.

Concerning temporary disability benefits, an employee is entitled to them if a physician totally restricts an employee from work or provides restrictions an employer cannot accommodate. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(1) and (2). Here, Mr. Holder was totally off work or had restrictions Mr. Marcum could not accommodate from October 2, 2019, through October 26, 2020. This represents a period of fifty-five weeks and four days. At Mr. Holder’s compensation rate of $309.33, this equates to $17,189.91. Mr. Marcum paid Mr. Holder a total of $1,550.00 over various weeks, so the Court holds Mr. Holder is entitled to $15,639.91 for this period.

After Mr. Holder found work, he earned $1,000.00 per month or $232.56 per week. Since he earned less than his average weekly wage, Mr. Holder is entitled to temporary partial disability from October 27, 2020, to the present. This is calculated by determining sixty-six and two-thirds the difference between his average weekly wage and the wage he earns. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(2)(A). Here, that represents $154.29 per week, so the Court holds Mr. Holder is entitled to $7,604.29 in temporary partial disability benefits for

1 This information came from answers that the Court deemed admitted. 2 the period when he returned to work to the present.2 Mr. Marcum shall continue paying these benefits until Mr. Holder is released without restrictions, earns his average weekly wage, or reaches maximum medical improvement.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Marcum shall pay Mr. Holder’s past medical expenses in the amount of $54,665.56 and provide ongoing medical treatment under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204 with Dr. Heilig as the treating physician.

2. Mr. Marcum shall pay Mr. Holder past temporary disability benefits in the amount of $23,244.20 and ongoing temporary partial disability under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-207(A)(2) until the restrictions are removed, he earns his average weekly wage, or he reaches maximum medical improvement.

3. This case is set for a Status Hearing on December 17 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern. You must call 855-543-5044 to participate in the hearing.

4. Unless an interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). The Employer must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit confirmation within seven business days may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, contact the Workers’ Compensation Compliance Unit via email at WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

ENTERED October 6, 2021.

_____________________________________ BRIAN K. ADDINGTON, JUDGE Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

2 As to the benefit calculation, $464.00 minus $232.56 equals $231.44, of which sixty-six and two-thirds is $154.29. The total amount represents forty-nine weeks and two days of temporary partial disability benefits. 3 APPENDIX

Exhibits: 1. Harley Holder’s Affidavit 2. Admissions Deemed Admitted 3. (Collective) Medical Bills: Big South Fork Medical Center, Assured Orthopedics of Kentucky, Kentucky River Medical Center and Lighthouse Physical Therapy, Inc. 4. Medical Records-Big South Fork Medical Center 5. Medical Records-Assured Orthopedics of Kentucky 6. Medical Records-Kentucky River Medical Center 7. Medical Records-Lighthouse Physical Therapy, Inc.

Technical Record: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Dispute Certification Notice 3. Motion to Compel Discovery 4. Notice of Transmission of Request for Admissions 5. Order Granting Motion to Compel Discovery 6. Motion for Sanctions 7. Motion to Deem Request for Admissions as Admitted 8. Order Granting Additional Time to File Affidavit 9. Affidavit of Chris W. Beavers 10. Order Granting Attorney’s Fees 11. Order Deeming Answers Admitted 12. Hearing Request

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50
Tennessee § 50
§ 50-6-204
Tennessee § 50-6-204
§ 50-6-207
Tennessee § 50-6-207(1)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 TN WC 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holder-harley-v-nathan-marcum-dba-marcum-lumber-tennworkcompcl-2021.