Holder Distributors, Inc. v. Barr

204 So. 2d 250, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4107
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 21, 1967·No. No. J-52·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the decree of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See 6 Fla.Jur., Conditional Sales, § 57.62; Garrett & Co. v. Mercantile Natl. Bank (5th Cir. 1941), 120 F.2d 821; Linick v. Lamm (Fla.App.1962), 143 So.2d 551.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holder Distributors, Inc. v. Barr, 204 So. 2d 250, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4107 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

204 So. 2d 250 (Holder Distributors, Inc. v. Barr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linick v. Lamm
143 So. 2d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)