Holder Distributors, Inc. v. Barr
204 So. 2d 250, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4107
Opinion
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the decree of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See 6 Fla.Jur., Conditional Sales, § 57.62; Garrett & Co. v. Mercantile Natl. Bank (5th Cir. 1941), 120 F.2d 821; Linick v. Lamm (Fla.App.1962), 143 So.2d 551.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holder Distributors, Inc. v. Barr, 204 So. 2d 250, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4107 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
204 So. 2d 250 (Holder Distributors, Inc. v. Barr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Linick v. Lamm
143 So. 2d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Garrett & Co. v. Mercantile Nat. Bank of Miami Beach
120 F.2d 821 (Fifth Circuit, 1941)