Holden v. Davey

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Holden v. Davey

29 Ohio C.C. Dec. 608, 20 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 537, 1905 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 378

DecidedMarch 6, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Ohio C.C. Dec. 608 (Holden v. Davey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holden v. Davey, 29 Ohio C.C. Dec. 608, 20 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 537, 1905 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 378 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

MARVIN, J.

The error complained of here is that the court sustained a demurrer to the second cause of action set out in the petition.

Two causes of action were set out in the petition. Demurrer was filed to each of said causes. The court overruled, and properly overruled the demurrer to the first.

The second cause of action begins with the words:

“For his second cause of action plaintiff says that he incorporates therein all the allegations set out in his first cause of action the same as if therein rewritten.” Then follows allegations which do not in themselves constitute a cause of action.

It is urged, however, that since by virtue of Sec. 5083 R S. (Sec. 1131 G. C.), the first cause of action is to be treated as though rewritten in the second, and since it is held that the first cause of action is good as against demurrer, it necessarily follows that the second cause of action was also good against a de[609]*609murrer, without reference to what follows, the allegations making the first cause a part of the second. Logically and technically this is correct, but since by overruling the demurrer to the first cause, the court had left the petition with that 'cause still to be answered, there was no prejudice to the plaintiff in the rulings as to the second. Since only facts stated in the petition which constitute a cause of action against the defendant were left in full force by the ruling on the demurrer, the plaintiff was not prejudiced by such a ruling as confined such facts to one cause of action, wherefore the judgment is affirmed!

Hale and Winch, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARVIN, J.

The error complained of here is that the court sustained a demurrer to the second cause of action set out in the petition.

Two causes of action were set out in the petition. Demurrer was filed to each of said causes. The court overruled, and properly overruled the demurrer to the first.

The second cause of action begins with the words:

“For his second cause of action plaintiff says that he incorporates therein all the allegations set out in his first cause of action the same as if therein rewritten.” Then follows allegations which do not in themselves constitute a cause of action.

It is urged, however, that since by virtue of Sec. 5083 R S. (Sec. 1131 G. C.), the first cause of action is to be treated as though rewritten in the second, and since it is held that the first cause of action is good as against demurrer, it necessarily follows that the second cause of action was also good against a de[609]*609murrer, without reference to what follows, the allegations making the first cause a part of the second. Logically and technically this is correct, but since by overruling the demurrer to the first cause, the court had left the petition with that 'cause still to be answered, there was no prejudice to the plaintiff in the rulings as to the second. Since only facts stated in the petition which constitute a cause of action against the defendant were left in full force by the ruling on the demurrer, the plaintiff was not prejudiced by such a ruling as confined such facts to one cause of action, wherefore the judgment is affirmed!

Hale and Winch, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Ohio C.C. Dec. 608, 20 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 537, 1905 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holden-v-davey-ohcirctcuyahoga-1905.