Holden v. City of New York

164 N.E.2d 728, 7 N.Y.2d 840
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 30, 1959·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: The reservation of a mere “ right of way ” under the decisions included only the right of passage over the surface of the land (Thompson v. Orange & Rockland Elec. Co., 254 N. Y. 366; Osborne v. Auburn Tel. Co., 189 N. Y. 393; Eels v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 143 N. Y. 133; Ferguson v. Producers Gas Co., 286 App. Div. 521; Matter of Bensel, 140 App. Div. 257). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Van Voorhis. Taking no part: Judge Burke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holden v. City of New York, 164 N.E.2d 728, 7 N.Y.2d 840 (N.Y. 1959).

164 N.E.2d 728 (Holden v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cannon Point North, Inc. v. City of New York
46 A.D.3d 146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
U.S. Cablevision Corp. v. Theodoreu
192 A.D.2d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Informal Opinion No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1983
Fox v. Ohio Valley Gas Corp.
222 N.E.2d 412 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1968)