Holcombe v. U.S. Airways, Inc. (In re U.S. Airways, Inc)

Fourth Circuit

Holcombe v. U.S. Airways, Inc. (In re U.S. Airways, Inc)

470 F. App'x 189

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 27, 2012

DocketNo. 11-1986

StatusPublished

This text of 470 F. App'x 189 (Holcombe v. U.S. Airways, Inc. (In re U.S. Airways, Inc)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holcombe v. U.S. Airways, Inc. (In re U.S. Airways, Inc), 470 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Fougere Holcombe appeals the district court’s order dismissing, as interlocutory, her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s March 22, 2011 order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holcombe v. U.S. Airways, Inc., Nos. 1:11-cv-00586-CMH-IDD; 04-13819-SSM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 10, 2011, and entered Aug. 11, 2011). We grant the motion to submit on briefs and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Fougere Holcombe appeals the district court’s order dismissing, as interlocutory, her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s March 22, 2011 order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holcombe v. U.S. Airways, Inc., Nos. 1:11-cv-00586-CMH-IDD; 04-13819-SSM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 10, 2011, and entered Aug. 11, 2011). We grant the motion to submit on briefs and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

470 F. App'x 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holcombe-v-us-airways-inc-in-re-us-airways-inc-ca4-2012.