Holcombe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Holcombe v. State

375 S.W.2d 914, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 877

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 4, 1964

DocketNo. 36556

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 375 S.W.2d 914 (Holcombe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holcombe v. State, 375 S.W.2d 914, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 877 (Tex. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is burglary with four prior convictions for felonies less than capital alleged for enhancement; the punishment, life. ■

“The record on appeal does not reflect that appellant has been sentenced in the trial court. Where no sentence has been pronounced in the trial court, this court is without jurisdiction to enter any order except to dismiss the appeal.” Aguirre v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 271 S.W.2d 819. See also Skaggs v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 88, 311 S.W.2d 410.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is burglary with four prior convictions for felonies less than capital alleged for enhancement; the punishment, life. ■

“The record on appeal does not reflect that appellant has been sentenced in the trial court. Where no sentence has been pronounced in the trial court, this court is without jurisdiction to enter any order except to dismiss the appeal.” Aguirre v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 271 S.W.2d 819. See also Skaggs v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 88, 311 S.W.2d 410.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 S.W.2d 914, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holcombe-v-state-texcrimapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack