Holcombe v. Lastinger

167 S.E. 605, 46 Ga. App. 320, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 46
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 27, 1933·No. 22538·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. The guardian of a lunatic or an imbecile is entitled to retain possession and control of his ward’s property so long as the ward remains mentally incompetent, unless his letters of guardianship be revoked and another guardian appointed; and an action by an ordinary, suing as next friend of the ward, upon the guardian’s bond, for a devastavit committed by the guardian, can not be maintained, unless in connection therewith a proceeding be brought to remove the guardian and revoke his letters. Bonner v. Evans, 89 Ga. 656 (3) (15 S. E. 906).

[321] Decided January 27, 1933. J. W. Butler, J. A. Merritt, John B. Odum, for plaintiff. Wilcox, Connell & Wilcox, for defendants.

2. Applying the foregoing ruling to the facts of the instant ease, the court did not err in dismissing the amended petition upon general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre amd Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holcombe v. Lastinger, 167 S.E. 605, 46 Ga. App. 320, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 46 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

167 S.E. 605 (Holcombe v. Lastinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tucker v. American Surety Co. of New York
50 S.E.2d 859 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Dillon v. Bessant
199 S.E. 852 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Dillon v. Sills
187 S.E. 725 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)