Holcombe v. Holcombe

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Holcombe v. Holcombe

29 N.J. Eq. 375

DecidedMarch 15, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 29 N.J. Eq. 375 (Holcombe v. Holcombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holcombe v. Holcombe, 29 N.J. Eq. 375 (N.J. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The practice in such cases as established in this court has always been to require all parties interested to join in the petition, and then, if any one declines to proceed, to apply for a summons and severance. An amendment of the petition may be allowed for the purpose of adding the other executor as a formal party, and, if necessary, the prosecuting executor may then apply for a summons and severance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The practice in such cases as established in this court has always been to require all parties interested to join in the petition, and then, if any one declines to proceed, to apply for a summons and severance. An amendment of the petition may be allowed for the purpose of adding the other executor as a formal party, and, if necessary, the prosecuting executor may then apply for a summons and severance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 N.J. Eq. 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holcombe-v-holcombe-nj-1878.