Holcombe v. Holcombe
This text of 197 Ga. 105 (Holcombe v. Holcombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Cruel treatment as ground for divorce “is the wilful infliction of pain, bodily or mental, upon the complaining party, such as reasonably justifies an apprehension of danger to life, limb, or health.” Ring v. Ring, 118 Ga. 183 (44 S. E. 861, 62 L. R. A. 878) ; [106]*106Brown v. Brown, 129 Ga. 246 (58 S. E. 825) ; Stoner v. Stoner, 134 Ga. 368 (67 S. E. 1030) ; Adams v. Adams, 195 Ga. 479 (24 S. E. 2d, 683).
2. In the instant ease the petition contained sufficient allegations to show cruel treatment within the foregoing principle. Accordingly it was not error to overrule the general demurrer. Alford v. Alford, 189 Ga. 630 (1, 2) (7 S. E. 2d, 278) ; Cohen v. Cohen, 194 Ga. 573 (22 S. E. 2d, 132) ; Allen v. Allen, 194 Ga. 591 (22 S. E. 2d, 136) ; Twilley v. Twilley, 195 Ga. 291 (5, 7) (24 S. E. 2d, 41).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 Ga. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holcombe-v-holcombe-ga-1943.