Holcombe v. Heard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Holcombe v. Heard

112 S.E. 830, 28 Ga. App. 658, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 760

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 14, 1922

Docket13119

StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 830 (Holcombe v. Heard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holcombe v. Heard, 112 S.E. 830, 28 Ga. App. 658, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 760 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The original petition set out a cause of action. The amendment thereto was properly allowed, and the court did not err in overruling the “ oral general demurrer ” to the petition as amended.

[659]*659Decided June 14, 1922.

Complaint; from city court of Atlanta — J udge Beid. October 22, 1921.

Etheridge, Sams & Etheridge, for plaintiff in error. Dorsey, Brewster, Howell & Heyman, contra.

2. None of the special grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial shows reversible error.

3. There is ample evidence to support the verdict for $282.89, the amount at which it was allowed to stand after the plaintiff had voluntarily written off $17.11 from $300, the amount for which the jury returned, a verdict. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI