Holcomb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Holcomb v. State

443 So. 2d 185, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25172

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 1983·No. No. 82-863·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgments of conviction and sentences under review are affirmed upon a holding that the substance of the improperly admitted criminal convictions of the defendant herein had already been properly placed before the jury upon the state’s cross-examination of the defendant’s character witnesses herein. As such, we think the evidence error here was harmless under the circumstances of this case. Culberson v. State, 210 So.2d 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 218 So.2d 171 (Fla. 1968). §§ 59.041, 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1981); see also Cornelius v. State, 49 So.2d 332 (Fla.1950); Sias v. State, 416 So.2d 1213, 1217-18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), pet. for rev. den., 424 So.2d 763 (Fla.1982).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgments of conviction and sentences under review are affirmed upon a holding that the substance of the improperly admitted criminal convictions of the defendant herein had already been properly placed before the jury upon the state’s cross-examination of the defendant’s character witnesses herein. As such, we think the evidence error here was harmless under the circumstances of this case. Culberson v. State, 210 So.2d 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 218 So.2d 171 (Fla. 1968). §§ 59.041, 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1981); see also Cornelius v. State, 49 So.2d 332 (Fla.1950); Sias v. State, 416 So.2d 1213, 1217-18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), pet. for rev. den., 424 So.2d 763 (Fla.1982).

Holcomb v. State, 443 So. 2d 185, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25172 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

443 So. 2d 185 (Holcomb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related